|
Contact
+ Stefan Blaschke
Search
+ Search Form
Introduction
+ Aims & Scope
+ Structure
+ History
Announcements
+ Updates
+ Calls for Papers
+ New Lectures
+ New Publications
Alphabetical Index
+ Author Index
+ Speaker Index
Chronological Index
+ Ancient History
+ Medieval History
+ Modern History
Geographical Index
+ African History
+ American History
+ Asian History
+ European History
+ Oceanian History
Topical Index
+ Prosecution
+ Cases
+ Types
+ Offenders
+ Victims
+ Society
+ Research
+ Representations
Resources
+ Institutions
+ Literature Search
+ Research
|
Start:
Alphabetical Index:
Author Index:
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
Unknown
First published: October 1, 2023 - Last updated: October 1, 2023
TITLE INFORMATION
Author: Carrie Leonetti
Title: Opposite sides of the same coin
Subtitle: Syndrome evidence, child abuse and the wrongful conviction of Peter Hugh McGregor Ellis
Journal: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume: (Published online before print)
Issue:
Year: 2023 (Received: October 20, 2022, Published online: August 14, 2023)
Pages:
pISSN: 1321-8719 -
Find a Library: WorldCat |
eISSN: 1934-1687 -
Find a Library: WorldCat
Language: English
Keywords:
Modern History:
20th Century |
Oceanian History:
New Zealand History |
Prosecution:
Trials/
Wrongful Convictions;
Cases:
Real Offenders /
Peter Hugh McGregor Ellis;
Types:
Child Sexual Abuse
FULL TEXT
Link:
Taylor & Francis Online (Restricted Access)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Author:
Carrie Leonetti,
Law School,
University of Auckland
Abstract:
»Introduction of evidence relating to the now-discredited behavioural-science syndrome known as 'child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome' in R v Ellis demonstrates the danger of syndrome reasoning in judicial fact finding. Comparable syndrome evidence is still used in the Family Court in the form of 'parental alienation syndrome'. Ellis should sound the death knell for all forensic applications of unreliable syndrome reasoning in the courts.«
(Source: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law)
Contents:
| |
Introduction (p. 1) |
| |
Background (p. 1) |
| |
Ellis and CSAAS (p. 5) |
| |
CSAAS and syndrome reasoning in CSA trials (p. 9) |
| |
|
Legislative history (p. 9) |
| |
|
New Zealand caselaw (p. 10) |
| |
|
|
R v B I (p. 11) |
| |
|
|
R v Accused (p. 11) |
| |
|
|
R v Crime Appeal (p. 12) |
| |
|
|
R v B II (p. 12) |
| |
|
|
G v R (p. 13) |
| |
|
|
EA revision (p. 14) |
| |
|
|
R v A (p. 14) |
| |
|
Kentucky case study (p. 15) |
| |
|
Ellis (p. 20) |
| |
PAS in family court (p. 21) |
| |
Conclusion (p. 23) |
| |
Appendix 1 (p. 26) |
Wikipedia:
History of Oceania:
History of New Zealand |
Sex and the law:
Child sexual abuse /
Child sexual abuse in New Zealand,
Peter Ellis (childcare worker)
|